A few things that should probably be here.

-Quick reply: The ability to just type something quickly into a box at the bottom of the screen rather than have to open up the big window to reply even though you won't use anything in it saves a little time and is a convenience that almost all forums have.

-Multiquote: Not that big of a necessity, as you can always just "@ name" if you need to, but I've seen some people use this feature a lot.

-Mod Group: It's open to request membership. That's generally not a good idea if the group gives staff powers.

QUICK REPLY, Yes Please.

As for Multi-Quote i guess it could be useful.

The first two can be done.

For now, I don't believe we'll be accepting any more staff members. We're small enough as it is, and the three of us can handle it.

In basis what your trying to get across is until this get's bigger no more staff is needed, seems fair enough.

Uh, I meant that actual group itself, here:
https://cardgamecoalition.forumotion.com/g2-moderators
let users click a button to ask to be added in at the time of the OP, but it's apparently been fixed. I wasn't saying that people should be able to ask for staff, but now that you bring it up, isn't that the whole point of the Elections forum?

Done.

IceDorago wrote:Uh, I meant that actual group itself, here:
https://cardgamecoalition.forumotion.com/g2-moderators
let users click a button to ask to be added in at the time of the OP, but it's apparently been fixed. I wasn't saying that people should be able to ask for staff, but now that you bring it up, isn't that the whole point of the Elections forum?

... Didn't even notice that. Lunar has it fixed though.

To answer your question... yeaaaaah... prolly just gonna keep that empty for now. Up to Lunar. . _.

Elections will be held when we think we need mods.

Quick suggestion, could you post a thread for what post count you need for different levels? I mean not like I'm desperate or care about my member level but to save future questions.